54448 comments

• Comment Link
  
  assurans

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 04:51

  Integrating Traditional and Modern Medicine for Holistic Health https://www.kadenze.com/users/revatio assurans. Exploring the Intersection of Traditional and Modern Medicines
• Comment Link
  
  DavidGep

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 04:41

  The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
  кракен
  
  Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
  
  The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
  https://kra26c.cc
  kraken onion
  The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
  
  So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
  
  In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
  
  Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
  But does that still hold true in 2024?
  
  According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
  
  “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
  
  “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
  
  Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
• Comment Link
  
  k8casinoCob

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 04:28

  CR聖戦士ダンバイン
  
  f ミュ
  
  友達と一緒に行くと、盛り上がりが倍増します。共通の趣味として楽しむことができます。
  
  
  攻殻機動隊S.A.C. 2nd GIG
  
  https://www.turboslott.com/?WatchID=925578818.html
  音楽と演出が楽しく、プレイ中に笑顔になれます。リラックスできます。
  
  
  政宗
  
  雪 泉
  
  キュインぱちすろ南国育ち 1st vacation
  
  アナザーゴッドハーデス-奪われたZEUSver
  
  P 北斗の拳 暴凶星
  
  
  L 大工の源さん 超夢源
  
  みん スロ
  
  吉宗
  
  CR七つの大罪
  
  秘宝伝 伝説への道
  
  
  P ぱちんこ シン・エヴァンゲリオン Type レイ
  
  アリーナ 柏
  
  鬼武者3
  
  麻雀物語
  
  CR暗黒騎士呀鎧伝
  
  
  ハイビスカスSE
  
  https://www.jogadoresanonimos.org/?ReviewID=920992818.html
  大当たり時の演出が特に豪華で、楽しさを感じます。期待感が高まります。
  
  
  P Re:ゼロから始める異世界生活 鬼がかりver.
  
  https://xn--k8-9g4a3b4f.site/?ReviewID=922738818.html
  シンプルなルールで、誰でもすぐに楽しめるのが嬉しいです。
• Comment Link
  
  JosephUnast

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 03:15

  The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
  кракен ссылка
  
  Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
  
  The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
  https://kra26c.cc
  kraken войти
  The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
  
  So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
  
  In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
  
  Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
  But does that still hold true in 2024?
  
  According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
  
  “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
  
  “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
  
  Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
• Comment Link
  
  MosesStogE

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 02:17

  The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
  kraken shop
  
  Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
  
  The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
  https://kra26c.cc
  kraken тор браузер
  The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
  
  So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
  
  In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
  
  Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
  But does that still hold true in 2024?
  
  According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
  
  “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
  
  “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
  
  Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
• Comment Link
  
  ForrestMag

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 01:22

  What’s on board this flight
  Blue Origin had planned to launch a pair of Mars-bound satellites on behalf of NASA for the first flight of New Glenn.
  
  But delays with the rocket’s development prompted the space agency to change course, moving that flight to this spring at the earliest. So for this inaugural flight, Blue Origin opted to instead fly a “demonstrator” that will test technology needed for the company’s proposed Blue Ring spacecraft — which will aim to serve as a sort of in-space rideshare vehicle, dragging satellites deeper into space when needed.
  omg тор браузер
  The demonstrator on this New Glenn flight will remain aboard the rocket for the entire six-hour flight, Blue Origin said, and it will validate “communications capabilities from orbit to ground” as well as “test its in-space telemetry, tracking and command hardware, and ground-based radiometric tracking.”
  
  The Blue Ring Pathfinder demonstrator is part of a deal Blue Origin inked with the US Department of Defense’s Defense Innovation Unit.
  https://omgprice10.com
  omg вход
  Why Blue Origin wants to reuse rockets
  Similar to SpaceX, Blue Origin is aiming to recover and refly its first-stage rocket boosters in a bid to make launches less expensive.
  
  “Reusability is integral to radically reducing cost-per-launch,” the company said in a recent news release, using the same oft-repeated sentiment that SpaceX has touted since it began landing rocket boosters in 2015.
  Bezos, however, has acknowledged the importance of reusing rocket parts since he founded the company in 2000 — two years before Musk established SpaceX. And the company has already developed its suborbital New Shepard tourism rocket to be reusable.
  “It’s not a copy cat game,” Henry said. “Blue Origin has been pursuing reusable vehicles since before reusable vehicles were cool. Now it’s much more of a mainstream idea (because of SpaceX). The difference is that it’s taken Blue Origin so much longer to get to orbit.”
  
  If successful, returning the New Glenn rocket booster for a safe landing will be a stunning feat. After expending most of its fuel to propel the rocket’s upper stage to space, the first-stage booster will need to make a clean separation. The booster must then maneuver with pinpoint guidance and reignite its engines with precision timing to avoid crashing into the ocean or the Jacklyn recovery platform.
• Comment Link
  
  work from home

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:51

  Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Thank you so
  much, However I am encountering troubles with
  your RSS. I don't know why I cannot join it. Is there anybody
  having identical RSS issues? Anyone that knows the answer will
  you kindly respond? Thanks!!
• Comment Link
  
  Josephdaync

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:35

  Booster les Spectateurs Twitch et Kick
  streamhub
• Comment Link
  
  Josephdaync

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:24

  Booster les Spectateurs Twitch et Kick
  streamhub
• Comment Link
  
  Doramahit

  Wednesday, 29 January 2025 00:10

  Русская озвучка делает просмотр комфортным, позволяя не отвлекаться на чтение субтитров и в полной мере наслаждаться сюжетом. Если хочешь следить за новинками и сразу получать переведенные серии, стоит заглянуть сюда – новые дорамы с русской озвучкой онлайн. Это один из первых сайтов в Яндексе, где можно найти актуальные релизы без задержек.